We reviewed the raw vote counts from the Iowa caucuses. Here are some of the numerous inconsistencies and errors we found in the results released by the state’s Democratic party.

51
102
284
Likes
  • HugginsViola
  • ejwalker7
  • dawn_navygirl
  • ConservativeRG
  • HokieFin72
  • _strate
  • Hillbilly_Matt
  • NajibMiah
  • BostonStuff
Replies
  • Replying to @nytimes

    So Bernie won. And the media keeps reporting Pete won. Got it. Bernie blackout will continue. We know the story

    0
    0
    13
  • Luis
    14 days ago

    Replying to @nytimes

    And now you see why they didn’t want to show the votes before!

    0
    0
    6
  • Replying to @nytimes

    These clowns had four years to prepare for counting votes in a small state, which they botched spectacularly. Now, they have grander designs to manage the wealthiest country on the planet. What could possibly go wrong?

    0
    0
    3
  • Replying to @nytimes

    जो पहले-पहले चुम्बन के बाद लाम पर चला गया नयी दुल्हन की सेज छोड़कर युद्ध-काम पर चला गया उनको भी मीठी यादों की करवट याद रही होगी खुशबू मे भीगी यादों की सलवट याद रही होगी उन आँखों की दो बूंदों से सातों सागर हारे हैं जब मेंहदी वाले हाथों ने मंगलसूत्र उतारे हैं -हरिओम पंवार

    0
    1
    1
  • Replying to @nytimes

    They’re rigging it again

    0
    0
    3
  • Replying to @nytimes

    America, the worlds freedom police, bringing democracy to uncivilized nations at the end of a gun barrel, does not give its own people free and fair elections.

    0
    0
    4
  • Cody
    14 days ago

    Replying to @nytimes

    @TomPerez resign

    1
    0
    5
  • Replying to @nytimes

    surely none of these errors had any negative impact on the one candidate we know the democratic establishment likes the least

    0
    0
    2
  • Replying to @nytimes

    it's a caucus - it's nonsense and it's over

    0
    0
    2