James Andrews

James Andrews

@slaterson101

Followers114
Following219

Writer, political Inspector and a student of the truth.

Joined on December 27, 2018
@slaterson101 Statistics

We looked inside some of the tweets by @slaterson101 and found useful information for you.

Inside 100 Tweets

Time between tweets:
an hour
Average replies
32
Average retweets
189
Average likes
903
Tweets with photos
5 / 100
Tweets with videos
0 / 100
Tweets with links
0 / 100
Fun Fact

The most followed brand on Twitter is YouTube with 71 million followers.

Quoted @RBReich

Just a reminder: No human being is illegal on stolen land.

Just a reminder: This is an intentional statement made to play on your ignorance of American History and the law of its land in hopes of persuading you to support his political position and by proxy his financial gain. Don't fall for it. Do better. Be better. Become better. https://t.co/IPaM0Uso5j

0
0
2

There are comedies. And then there is Airplane!

0
0
0

Quoted @realDonaldTrump

I gave a long news conference today after wishing the military a Happy Thanksgiving, & realized once again that the Fake News Media coordinates so that the real message of such a conference never gets out. Primary point made was that the 2020 Election was RIGGED, and that I WON!

This site is free and I still can't believe it. https://t.co/RwwRQ9LCVK

0
0
0

C'mon. We are hunks of meat with short sighted brains. They are human as much as you and I. Have you ever lied? Have you ever lied to gain? Of course you have. Don't give these who hold authority over you the benefit of the doubt. They have not earned it. END/

0
0
0

Do you really think we are that far further advanced than those of whom ruled the Roman Empire? Or the British Empire? The Nazi or Soviet Empires? 5/

1
0
0

Within a single year how many times have you seen it!? How many times! This isn't about safety. This is people in positions of influence and power becoming corrupted. It isn't a conspiracy, it is watching the flaw of man and it's consequence in real time. 4/

1
0
0

Disenfranchisement is your immediate enemy, but the real foe is those who flaunt their authority and superiority over you and justify it by declaration that they know what is better for you and your family and seeing the hypocrisy in front of your very eyes and in real time.3/

1
0
0

The evidence of whether it "lies" or "malpractice" or something in between questionable throughout, such is the currency in an age of disinformation during the information revolution. 2/

1
0
0

Thread Stealing a quote from @wokal_distance "The social capital that scientists, universities, experts and the media rely on to do their job is *TRUST* They lose a little bit of that capital every time those of us who rely on them to run our lives find out we've been liedto."

1
0
0

No. Laziness. Twitter wants to "adapt" whether it due to political or social pressure but they will nvr overhaul their entire UI for the good of social cohesion. Because, rage bait and rage clicks and rage responses drive rage ad revenue and rage is all the rage these days. END/

0
0
0

It is far easier to tell someone they are an idiot and don't know what they are talking about because they are limited to 240 characters than it is to write a thorough and well written response in the 10,000 area. Conspiracy? 8/

1
0
0

post of the "thread" before I have to click "expand" to see the rest of it. Dedicated users put up with the restrictions and find a way around it but in regards to "Replies" to posts, it literally encourages "dunking' (see Reply Guys) and hostility. 7/

1
0
0

writing a post as long as the one you are reading now. Why is that? I hardly believe its an infrastructural problem or even a user interface one. Facebook minimizes length posts to only show the first 250 so characters and even twitter itself will only show you the first 7/

1
0
0

What is wrong with allowing someone to "tweet" their thoughts without confinement? Without restrictions? I mean, Jack and his entire staff insist on believing in freedom of speech and expression and insist Twitter is a tool to do just that, and yet, they restrict me from 6/

1
0
0

changed in years. and it touts itself as a public platform for mutual discourse. I wont bother getting into the clear bias of censoring or throttling right wing accounts that become to influential but instead ask the question. 5/

1
0
0

And yet, in spite of it's main use, albeit in the form of what was previously mentioned coupling this with journos and "blue checks" and "reply guys" making an actual living off of it (no different than instagram models and onlyfans thots), the character limit has not been 4/

1
0
0

Twitter -- unlike facebook -- is used heavily in political discourse. Dominantly in fact. Do you know how much Twitter's stock would drop if President Trump deleted his account? I can't remember the number specifically but it was "oh shit" level. 3/

1
0
0

Oh well - Unironic Thread/ *Theres the limit. That's how far you can go until you gotta create "threads" which make reading and posting a goddamn nightmare on that site and forces you to make your points quickly and without detailed contextualization. 2/

1
0
0
Next Page